future_guardian: Evil fairy in black and white (Default)
I apologize for any potential typos...I am so ragey about this right now (and I'm not even an author!).

If anyone happens to be a horror/mystery/romance reader, you might be interested to know about this really bad company.  So, last year (2010) Leisure/Dorchester stopped paying authors for their books because they were sort-of-but-not-really going bankrupt.  Around this time, the Leisure website had a post about "Hey everyone, we're going to stop publishing Mass Market Paperback and focus exclusively on ebooks!  Because we are innovative!"  Yeah, sure, not because you were late in the ebook game and now you've screwed yourself!  So anyway, writers stopped getting paid and there was a time when Leisure wasn't releasing any books.  So a bunch of writers did one of two things: find another publishing company  and start fresh or find another publishing company and get all rights to their backstock (um, not sure if that's the right word).  Sounds like that's the end, right?

WRONG!

In 2011 (actually, new reports are saying as early as late 2010) Leisure/Dorchester began putting unauthorized copies of their big-name authors in ebook form on places like Amazon.  I always thought if an author said "Okay, publishing company, you screwed me over and I want my books back so I can do whatever with them" then the author gets to do whatever they want with their work and their relationship with the publishing company is done.  Which would mean the publishing company has lost all rights to the work.  Except Leisure/Dorchester is all "Oh no!  How did this happen!  Oh, wait, it's Amazon's fault.  We'll look into it" and "Oh no!  Why are all these readers so upset?  We are innocent!"  Also, they've been making it difficult for people to comment on their Facebook page.

You know what?  This is absolutely the sign of a bad publishing company.  It's bad enough that they didn't pay their authors the first time around.  It's worse that they agreed to revert all rights back to their authors and then go back on that.  It's even worse they're acting like they have no idea what's going on and everyone (authors, readers) is making a big deal about nothing.  This is most definitely something. 

Anyone who wants to get the word out can go to Twitter and use hashtag #BoycottDorchester.  It's interesting to read the tweets already there.
future_guardian: Evil fairy in black and white (Default)

First of all, I will get it out of the way: I am/was a genre loyalist (of sorts) myself.  Not that I haven't read much in the way of horror novels since the big publishing company went in a very, very, VERY bad direction (ebooks and trade paperback), but when I DID, I was.  As in, loved, loved, LOVED my horror.  Had to have two or three horror novels in my To Be Read pile.  Would not enjoy novels that didn't have some sort of horror element (although, at this point, urban fantasy was getting extremely formulaic; if it had been awesome and every author's work had been their own, I would've also loved, loved, LOVED my urban fantasy for different reasons).  Here's the biggie:  I did not want to hear people say "Oh, the horror genre sucks!"  I also had problems with this idea that some book reviewers and commenters on their articles said "Only scary people read horror."  Uh, absolutely not.  I think, in the case of this comment, I was justified in being insulted.  But I had genre loyalty and it was BAD. 

This brings me to my point.  Right now, there are a bunch of romance readers and writers up in arms over a woman saying "Romance as a whole is rapey and there is nothing feminist about reading romance." 

I semi agree on point number one and completely agree on point number two, and I promise this is important to my overall point.  I tend to stick with paranormal romance because I like supernatural elements in anything I read, and oh boy is it bad relationships all over the place.  I wouldn't say they're "rapey" as much as "guy calls all the shots."  Even books that are "progressive" where the man and the woman agree to work as an equal unit end up with the guy making most of the decisions and getting all possessive and so on.  Never mind that a lot of these relationships are based on claiming, and sometimes it doesn't even make sense.  I could get the claiming if the man is, say, a part-time creature.  I don't understand it when the man is a god or demon.  As for the second point, I think most women read romance for the fantasy of it.  A few even admit to inserting themselves in place of the female lead at all times.  It just seems like, with all the garbage in the genre (not that all of it is garbage, by the way), you'd want to read it as an escape but say "I'm glad that's NOT me."  Unfortunately, I've never heard THAT from anyone.  Oh well, I have high expectations, so...take from that what you will.

Really, the only reason I read romance is because I can't write relationships.  I've never been in a relationship and it doesn't seem like something that'll happen anytime soon (for various reasons).  There is so much more to this paragraph, but I'll wait a few paragraphs down to make it.

The larger point I wanted to make is this: Romance readers/writers, there are going to be people who hate your genre.  I know, it sucks.  Try thinking you're a well adjusted person, only to be told you can't possibly be a functioning, decent member of the community because you read horror novels.  It's a part of life.  But more importantly, it's okay that people hate your genre.  Not everyone is going to love it just because you do.  In fact, I'd take it a step further and say most people hate the genre, not YOU.  So please, please, PLEASE for the love of everything cute and fluffy stop getting insulted over people saying stuff that may even possibly be true about your genre.  Now, it's different if someone actually does hate you for what you read.  You might be able to make a better case for yourself then.  But from what I've been seeing, it's you folks not being able to handle negative comments because you're such genre loyalists.

And here's some food for thought.  Okay, let's take me.  The two paragraphs above, I say I only read romance so I can write relationships in my own work.  There's more to it.  See, a lot of women read romance for the steaminess and such (which is part of the escape, I guess).  I can't physically/mentally get turned on by that.  I don't know why, I just can't.  I'd also like to add that there are a few book blog websites that have this feature where they post an image of this hot guy.  A lot of people get a lot out of this.  I look at those images and think "Hmmmmm, interesting scenery." or "Odd, I've never seen anyone off the street look like that." or even "Meh."  I do, however, love when these book blog websites post images of locations inspired by the books they read.  Here's another thing: When I read romance, I base my opinion on the book on how the female lead is written.  I like a good female lead (which kind of contradicts my love of horror novels but perfectly explains why I like some urban fantasy).  A book could get a "Oh hey, that was actually really good" because the female lead was engaging, intelligent, someone worth reading about, sarcastic without going over the top, or other related stuff.  The men may be interesting as well, but I do not give books high ratings because of them.  The men just do not do it for me in any sense.  Of course, I read romance novels for different reasons than most (it really is research, and I have learned a lot).  Still, the genre just doesn't appeal to me the way it does to others.

I'd like these genre loyalists to consider that.  Maybe their favorite genre is just not doing it for others.  It doesn't necessarily mean we hate you (and if someone comes across that way, whether it's me or Mr. Random, feel free to ignore/walk away), it just means we don't like the genre.

On a very related note, I am not, by any means, a scary person.  I have a part-time job that I am reasonably capable at.  I want a much more substantial part-time job, and I know I can do the work.  I will be going to college either this summer or this fall (whichever semester I can get into) on a partial scholarship (that I intend to keep all four years by working my butt off).  I may not look like the traditional girl, but I use good hygiene (please excuse the possible misspelling) and take care of myself.  I live at home at the moment, but I help around the house and take care of the pets (a tortoiseshell cat and tuxedo cat; they are fantabulous, usually).  I am a writer (unpublished as of right now) and although I'd love to write in my favorite genre (which is still horror in spite of not being able to keep up with it at the moment) I can't write my novel the right way for it.  I do not have the right edge, which is actually a good point.            
future_guardian: Evil fairy in black and white (Default)

To put it bluntly, yes.  And also no in some cases (one writer in particular writes solid romance with slightly-better-looking-but-nothing-worth-writing-home-about male leads and no/fade to black sex scenes, but she seems to be in the minority) , but mostly yes.  As a note, having not read a solid paranormal romance/romance novel in general for a few good years I can't speak for the new crop.  However, the stuff I read seemed more like the whole goal was to get the characters in bed, not to tell a story where the characters eventually ended up in bed because it was natural.  And that's the angle I'm coming from. 

This debate has been on my mind ever since I read my first paranormal romance and was hooked enough to search out more good books in the genre.  Honestly, I blame the searching aspect for some of this. 

For example, there was a post on the Amazon message board where longtime fans of paranormal romance talked about a fictional example of why their male partner should give up his porn, willingly or otherwise, but they can read their paranormal romance as much and as often as they want.  Because, as the consensus went, there is absolutely nothing porny about romance novels.  These women (and I believe there was one man who posted once in a while, but not so sure if it was on this particular topic) seemed quite intelligent when discussing their favorite novels and props to them for recommending stuff I enjoyed back then (it was a difficult task), but I couldn't see where they were coming from.  Still, I thought I was the only one who thought this and kept it quiet.

So then today I was doing my daily web searches and came across this post: http://www.smartbitchestrashybooks.com/index.php/weblog/comments/everything-i-need-to-know-i-learned-from-romance-novels-porn-vs.-romance/ which sums up the debate quite well.  Basically, this woman has a boyfriend who gave up his porn when he committed to her, and he wants her to give up her romance because he sees it as porn for women, and she disagrees and wonders what other romance readers think.  When I checked there were only three comments, but I'm thinking by the end of the day this topic will be overflowing with responses.  So far, the thoughts are generally "He shouldn't control what you read.  No one should control what you read" and "He made a choice.  Nobody told him to give it up."  Even if you're like me and disagree with the overall stance, I recommend reading this post because the question asker expresses herself well.  It seems as though she knows what she wants to hear, but she's also confused and genuinely needs the input, and she explains why her boyfriend's thoughts on her reading choice have been bothering her.

The whole point of this has been for me to express my thoughts, so on with my own personal views.  First of all, I firmly agree that you should read what you want.  I may find your choices head-deskable, but it is your reading, not my reading.  Second of all, I fail to see the difference between porn and romance novels.  They both concern hot people, they're both wish fullfillment, they both have the goal of turning you on (except for fade-to-black romance novels, which I think have more of a story).  Third, you know what?  From the paranormal romance novels I've read, I've read very few that were about characters connecting and going through the usual relationship process and eventually ending up in bed.  The authors use this idea of claiming, where the woman is bound to the man and vice versa because "It's destiny!", which leads to "I love you!"  "I love you more!" "Let's hop into bed!" "Yes!"  The end.  Where's the romance?  Claiming is a very paranormal idea and there's definitely sex scenes, but where is the connection that's supposed to separate  porn from romance?  Because if the only reason for saying "Romance is not porn!" is that romance is coming from a "different place" and "there's a connection!" I'm not seeing it.

As a very related side note, talk about controlling.  You're not allowed to tell someone "You can't read that!" in real life, yet this subject of claiming in novels is considered romantic.  *Sigh*  
   

Profile

future_guardian: Evil fairy in black and white (Default)
future_guardian

April 2011

S M T W T F S
     12
3456 789
10111213141516
17 181920 212223
24252627282930

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags